logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.05 2018고단637
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of a fine of two million won at the Seoul Central District Court for a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving), and the same type of criminal records is three times more.

1. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of a car with the horses set forth in B.

On December 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:20, as the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu, 159 U.S. C. C. (47 years old) driven the front part of the Defendant’s driving car, which was pushed down by the victim C.(47 years old) who stopped on the rear side while driving the signal at the 4-lane eth of the ethrode of the ethic f.g. e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e. the e. the e.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence as above, destroyed the front part of the vehicle owned by the victim E by the victim E, so that the repair cost can not be caused, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

2. On December 28, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol to the Defendant from G at the 2nd floor parking lot of the apartment complex underground located in 1193, in Gyeyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, Annyang-gu, annyang-gu, annyang-gu, annyang-gu, annyang-gu, annan-gu, annan-gu, annan-gu, annan-gu, annann-gu, annann-gu, annann-gu, ann-gu

have reasonable grounds to determine that there is a reasonable

Along with the recognition of the foregoing G from 22:14 to 22:34 on the same day, the same day was requested for a measurement of drinking on four occasions, but did not comply with it without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged vehicles;

1. Articles 148, 54(1), 148-2(1)2, and 44(2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime (the choice of each imprisonment with labor) of the relevant Act;

arrow