1. The Defendant’s KRW 24,076,40 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from May 3, 2013 to July 17, 2014.

1. Details, etc. of ruling;

A. The approval and public notice of the project (hereinafter “instant project”): Gwangju-original (Seoul) Highway (Seoul) - No. 2010-129, public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on March 4, 2010, No. 2010-262, May 3, 2010 - Project operator No. 2010-262, the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs announced on May 3, 201 - Project operator: Defendant (competent Regional National Land Management Office)

B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on expropriation by March 22, 2013 - Land subject to expropriation by the Central Land Tribunal: The Plaintiff’s land is expropriated with the size of 739 square meters out of 1,385 square meters in 1,385 square meters in Hanju-si, the Plaintiff’s ownership, and remaining land remaining after expropriation with the size of 646 square meters remaining (hereinafter “the remaining land of this case”): The starting date of expropriation: May 2, 2013 - An appraisal corporation: a dialogue appraisal corporation, a stock company, a future appraisal corporation, a stock company (hereinafter “appraisal”), and compensation for losses: 140,410,000 won:

C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on July 18, 2013 - 140,410,000 won such as the adjudication of expropriation as compensation for losses, and the Plaintiff’s claim for expropriation of the remaining land of this case is dismissed - An appraisal corporation: Pacific appraisal corporation, Pacific appraisal corporation, and Gaion appraisal corporation (hereinafter “indicator”) (hereinafter “indicator”) / There is no dispute as to the result of the appraisal / (i) / (ii) 1, 2, 4, and 1, and (iii) / The purport of the entire pleadings, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. The plaintiff's assertion

A. The appraisal of the claim for increase in compensation for losses and the appraisal of the objection are erroneous as follows. The legitimate compensation for the land in this case shall be KRW 148,982,400, which is calculated according to the result of the court’s appraisal. Thus, the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff KRW 8,572,40, which is the difference between the above amount of compensation and the amount of compensation stipulated in the above appraisal

1. The land of this case and the specific use area, shape, utilization status, transportation conditions, factors forming the land price are similar to C.