Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On February 19, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for six months as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the resident support of the Daegu District Court.

On June 4, 2020, at around 20:15, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with E-rop in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.218% in the 4km section from the roads near the C cafeteria located in Ansan-si B to the roads near the Andong-si D apartment.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement, report on the results of the drinking driving control, report on the circumstances of drinking drivers, investigation report (report on the circumstances of drinking drivers), written appraisal of alcohol alcohol, investigation report on detection of drinking drivers (Attachment to video data), CDs;

1. Previous records before ruling: Criminal records, etc., an inquiry report, an investigation report (Attachment to the same attached power), a written judgment, a summary order, and the application of statutes on the list of related cases;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in 2009 and has been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in 209, and the crime of this case has been repeated despite the past record of criminal punishment three times or more, the numerical concentration of blood alcohol in this case exceeds 2.5 times or more as the criteria for the revocation disposition of a driver's license: Provided, That the recent criminal record of a drunk driving has been more than ten years prior to the lapse of a considerable time, and other various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive