1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the dismissal or addition of the corresponding parts as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited as it is in accordance with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

1)The Plaintiff, under the 11st page of the first instance judgment, had filed an administrative litigation against the instant separate disposition in this Court (No. 2019Guhap6699) with respect to the separate disposition of this case. The part shall be filled by the following:

“Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on May 27, 2019 seeking revocation of the instant separate disposition. However, on January 10, 2020, the said court rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant separate disposition was unlawful by abusing and abusing discretion. The Seoul High Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal against the said judgment on July 22, 2020 (Supreme Court Decision 2020Nu33727 Decided August 26, 2020). The Plaintiff filed a final appeal against the said appellate court judgment on August 26, 2020, and the said case is still pending in the Supreme Court (Supreme Court Decision 2020Du47250, hereinafter the said “related administrative litigation case”).

(i)No. 17 of the judgment of the first instance court (“B”) No. 17 of the first instance court’s No. 17 of the 6 Table “B” is raised.

Part 2, the 7th to 16th of the first instance judgment, shall be added as follows.

“A) The Defendant (or the Korea Communications Standards Commission) refers to the broadcast content forming a unit of broadcast programming for several times.

(See Article 2 subparag. 17 of the Broadcasting Act). A person has discretion to decide whether it is subject to a single deliberation and resolution.

The defendant asserts that, based on Article 33(3) and (4), Article 86(1), Article 100(1)2 and 3 of the Broadcasting Act, Article 62 of the Review Regulations, the defendant's individual deliberation and resolution by the Korea Communications Standards Commission on the violation of the Review Regulations shall be conducted once a broadcast program is provided.

The defendant.