The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the original court (eight months of imprisonment) shall be too unreasonable, because of the gist of the grounds for appeal.

2. The Defendant appears to reflect on recognizing the instant crime, and the Defendant sold a motor vehicle used for driving under the influence of alcohol in this case. However, the Defendant was the previous and four times of the suspension of execution, and the Defendant was the previous and the first time of the suspension of execution. The Defendant also committed the instant crime during the suspension of execution, and the Defendant began to receive a summary order on August 23, 2012 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving on October 16, 2012) and repeats the instant crimes several times in a short period until the instant crime was committed on five occasions for about one year until the instant crime was committed, and in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.