logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.10.18 2016고단2448
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The defendant is a person driving a k7 vehicle in Korea.

1. On June 27, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (if the Defendant was under influence of 0.208% a blood alcohol concentration of 0.208%, the Defendant was driving a two-lane road in front of the Central High School located in the Sungsi-gu, Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, with one-lane a two-lane a road from the cultural distance room to the cultural distance range. On the other hand, the Defendant was in front of the Defendant’s vehicle by occupational negligence, which was driven by E (n, 44 years old) while stopping on a two-lane right-hand right-hand side of the front bank, and continued to drive one kilometer a one-lane a road by the front of the house of Gyeongnam-do residents while driving the G (47 years old) on the right-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As above, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the said SM3 car to use approximately KRW 575,700 for repair costs, such as the left-hand exchange, etc.; and (b) did not immediately stop the said car and take necessary measures to confirm the fact of damage, etc., even though it damages approximately KRW 954,200 for repair costs, such as the replacement of the back-hander.

2. On June 27, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) driven the said K7 car with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.208% under the influence of alcohol around June 27, 2016 and went away, and the roads of three-lanes in front of the ewing Tri-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Seowon-si, with three-lanes in front of the Do office distance from the Do office distance.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering gear and steering devices.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and waits for a signal on three-lanes in the mastum bank by negligence that does not well see the front bank, and is driving by the victim I (58 years old) who was under the stop.

arrow