1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The plaintiffs' assertion is as follows.

In other words, the plaintiffs are the owners of the building of this case.

However, Defendant C, who was sold on June 8, 2012 the 8th floor, the immediate upper floor of the instant building, occupied and used the said building by arbitrarily loading things owned by Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”), the lessee of the said 8th floor building, in a manner of arbitrarily loading them in the instant building.

Therefore, Defendant C is the party who illegally loaded the building in question, and Defendant D is the owner of the loaded goods, and the Defendants are obligated to deliver the building in question to the Plaintiffs. Since the Defendants obtained unjust enrichment equivalent to the royalty due to the Defendants’ unlawful possession and use of the building in question, the Defendants are obligated to pay to each Plaintiffs unjust enrichment equivalent to KRW 1 million per month from December 19, 2012 to the date the delivery of the building is completed.

B. However, it is not sufficient to recognize the plaintiffs' above assertion only with the descriptions of Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants cannot be accepted. Thus, the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.