logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.01.20 2015고단836
특수절도
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. On March 16, 2015, the Defendant, at around 06:16, stolen the locked door of the “D” shop in Busan-gun C, Busan-gun C, and the first floor of “D,” by entering the cosmetic shop, thereby getting out of the cosmetic store, and having the amount of money equivalent to 6.40,000 won owned by the victim E, the main owner of the cosmetic store in the Kabbro, respectively.

2. As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements from investigative agencies, police officers F and G in this court, each investigation report prepared by F by police officers, and photographs of the CCTV images taken by the Defendant.

In this regard, the part that the defendant made a statement to the effect that the defendant led to the confession of the crime of this case among the written statements and the written statements by police officers prepared by the investigative agency, and each investigation report stating this purport is not different from the confession of the defendant, and as long as there is no evidence to reinforce the confession of the defendant, the confession of the defendant cannot be admitted as evidence of guilt.

Among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, there is an investigation report that contains a photograph of CCTV images to reinforce the confession of the defendant. Thus, it is hard to grasp the identity of the person taken at the scene of the crime in this case and the person whom the defendant himself/herself recognized, even if based on the result of the appraisal reply to the National Scientific Investigation Agency of this Court, it is difficult to understand the identity of the person taken at the scene of the crime in this case and the person whom the defendant himself/herself recognized, and ② it is difficult to understand that the color tag worn by the defendant was changed to the temporary ones at the scene of the crime, and it is difficult to understand at all 50 minutes from 06:21 to 07:12 after the scene of the crime, and ③ most of all CCTV is not available, and the body of the defendant is identical to the body of the person on which the defendant appeared at the scene of the crime.

arrow