logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.05.19 2016고단1693
퇴거불응등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant had no fixed residence with the victim C, and with the victim C, the relationship was the one in which the hedging was repeated from March 2015 to August 2015.

1. On May 29, 2015, the Defendant was demanded to demand the victim of the building D in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, Gyeyang-gu, to leave from the victim of the fluoral, e.g., assaulting the victim under the influence of alcohol, etc. on the part of the victim of the fluoral.

However, the defendant did not respond to the request for withdrawal of the victim without justifiable reasons until the police officer dispatched by the report of the victim at around 14:24 on the same day arrives.

In addition, from that to February 11, 2016, the Defendant refused to comply with the request for withdrawal of the victim by the same method 21 times in total, such as the list of offenses (1) in the victim’s residence.

2. The Defendant attempted to intrude upon his residence in a public toilet or park, entering the house of the said victim with his mind. On June 4, 2015, around 23:42, around 2015, around 23:42, the Defendant attempted to interfere with the said victim’s house, with knife him, with knife the knife of the knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with knife, with kn

In addition, from that time to January 8, 2016, the Defendant attempted to intrude the victim’s residence by the same method six times in total, such as the list of crimes in attached Form (2) in front of the victim’s residence, but failed to do so.

3. On November 20, 2015, at around 11:24, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the instant victim’s residence; (b) on November 20, 2015, the Defendant: (c) destroyed the instant victim’s fluoral failure without any reason; and (d) destroyed the victim’s fluoral window at the market price in which the victim is the victim’s possession.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow