logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2011.10.06 2011가합1975
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant B, C, and D shall be dismissed respectively.

2. The plaintiff's claims against the defendant E are all dismissed.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relationship between the parties (1) The Plaintiff is Defendant E’s child born out of wedlock.

(2) Defendant E is married to F on February 22, 1961 and has Defendant C, D, and B (hereinafter “Defendant C, D, and B”) as its child between F and F.

(3) After that, Defendant E is divorced from F, and is divorced from G on December 26, 1969, and H is employed between G and G.

B. Defendant E and G brought a divorce lawsuit against G on October 8, 2007 by Suwon District Court 2007Ddan22085 (hereinafter “instant divorce lawsuit”), and the conciliation was concluded to the effect that “Defendant E and G are divorced; G are paid KRW 300 million to Defendant E and compensation for delay after December 30, 2008; G is paid to Defendant E for 1/2 of the shares of each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 through 7, as a division of property.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant conciliation”). C.

Defendant E’s testamentary gift and the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants (1) on November 20, 2007, Defendant E, by means of a testamentary document (hereinafter “instant authentic document”) on November 20, 2007, deposited 1/4 of the shares to be transferred from G in the instant divorce lawsuit and 1/4 of the shares to be transferred to Defendant E, among the real estate listed in the attached list 1 through 7, deposited 1/4 of the shares to be transferred from G in the instant divorce lawsuit, respectively, and bequeathed 1/4 of the shares to be recovered, respectively.

(2) The Plaintiff and the Defendants concluded an agreement on December 15, 2009 with the following content: (a) the legacy of Defendant E are “instant legacy”; and (b) the real estate listed in the attached list 1 through 8 are “real estate 1 through 8”; and (c) the real estate 1 through 8 is combined; and (d) the Plaintiff and the Defendants entered into an agreement on December 15, 2009:

(hereinafter “instant agreement”). The arbitr shall consult with respect to the property owned by Defendant E as follows:

(1)

arrow