1. The Defendants’ decision on a provisional disposition case involving the Changwon District Court 2016Kahap10310 account books against the Plaintiffs is rendered.

(a) people;

B. On November 9, 2016, the Defendants filed an application with the Plaintiffs for a provisional disposition to allow perusal and copying of the documents listed in the separate documents pursuant to Article 12 of the Housing Act and Article 25 of the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act (Seoul District Court 2016Kahap10268) (hereinafter “prior provisional disposition”). On December 8, 2016, the court ordered the Plaintiffs to allow perusal and copying of the above documents at the association office of this case only within 10 days (from the date of receipt of notice of the decision to the Plaintiffs within 09:0 to 18:00 per day) except for legal holidays, while ordering the Plaintiffs to allow perusal and copying of the documents within the scope of 10 days (hereinafter “prior provisional disposition”) to dismiss the application for indirect compulsory payment of KRW 20 million per day of violation (hereinafter “prior provisional disposition”).

(2) The Plaintiffs offered a separate list (*) of the documents that were ordered to allow perusal and copying during the period specified in the prior provisional disposition, on the grounds that personal information leakage is likely to occur, or refused to provide the documents on the grounds that the said documents are documents not prescribed in the Housing Act, the Enforcement Decree of the Housing Act, or documents already made public.

C. On December 27, 2016, the Defendants filed an application for provisional disposition (the Changwon District Court 2016Kahap10310) with the Plaintiffs to the effect similar to the prior provisional disposition application (the Changwon District Court 2016Kahap10).

On January 23, 2017, the court ordered the Plaintiffs to “to allow perusal and copying of the documents listed in the separate documents list at the association office of this case only within ten working hours (09:00 to 18:00) from the day on which the decision was notified,” and decided to order the Defendants to jointly and severally pay an indirect compulsory payment of KRW 10 million per day of violation (hereinafter “the provisional disposition order of this case”), and the above decision reached the Plaintiffs on February 1, 2017.

The defendants are the defendants.