A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Highest 372]

1. On December 4, 2017, the Defendant committed a crime against Victim C in EPC located in Pyeongtaek-si D around 11:36, Dec. 4, 2017, the Defendant sold an item by deposit to the victim “150,000 won if it was deposited in KRW 150,000.

“ ........”

However, as the defendant required living expenses at the time, and did not possess the above game items, even if he receives money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to reduce the game items.

The Defendant received 150,000 won as the purchase price for game items from the national bank account (G) in the name of friendly job offering F.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On January 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 03:50 on January 10, 2018, at the Hanyang University’s nearby the Hanyang University, the Defendant reported that the Defendant sold cultural merchandise coupons posted on Pest North Korea, and sold cultural merchandise coupons to the victim who contacted the Defendant via Pestbook “75,000 won on deposit.”

“ ........”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the gift certificates even if he received money from the injured party because the defendant required living expenses at the time and did not have the cultural gift certificates.

The Defendant received 75,000 won from the victim as the purchase price for cultural merchandise coupons in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2018 Highest 642] On September 1, 2017, the Defendant connected the game called the Internet rbbbat operated by the UN CF, and falsely stated that the Defendant would transfer KRW 100,000 to the J of the victim’s (i.e., the transfer of KRW 100,000,000).

However, in fact, the Defendant did not possess an item.