1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)

A. The annexed drawings of the area of 1,113 square meters and the area of 6,418 square meters in Guangdo-si prior to C.

1. On the other hand, the principal lawsuit and counterclaim of this case shall be deemed to be satisfied.

A. On March 1, 2014, the Plaintiff and E concluded a loan agreement with the Defendant for use (hereinafter “instant loan agreement”) with the content that the Defendant will use part of the instant land for a period of five years and that the Defendant would use it free of charge (hereinafter “this case’s loan agreement”) on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff and E agreed that the lender would not recognize the installation of structures or facilities at the time when the loan period expires; (b) the borrower would restore the land to its original state at the expiration of the loan period for use; and (c) the borrower would not demand all of the beneficial costs.

B. After entering into the instant loan agreement, the Defendant: (a) installed a stable to raise salt, etc. on the instant land located within a development restriction zone without the permission of the competent authority; (b) in sequence, each point of which is indicated in the Annex 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1; and (c) indicated in the Annex 3, 6, 7, 8, 4, and 3; and (d) connected each point of which is indicated in the said Map 9, 10, 11, 12, and 9 in sequence; and (c) “in the instant land, the Defendant was punished by a fine of KRW 29 square meters and the same map 13, 14, 15, 16, and 13, and each point of which is linked in the order of KRW 5,000,000,000 for KRW 14,000 on April 6, 2014 without the permission of the competent authority.

C. The Plaintiff, despite having agreed to set up a farmer on the land of this case at the time when the Defendant entered into the loan agreement of this case, were raised and illegally raised livestock.