Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the guilty part against Defendant C and E and the judgment of the court of second instance shall be respectively.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 A 1) 사실 오인 주장 피고인 A은 2013. 3. 4. 경부터 ㈜X (2013. 2. 경 변경되기 전 상호는 ㈜W, 이하 통칭하여 ‘Y ’라고 한다 )에서 근무하였으므로 그 이전의 범행에는 관여한 사실이 없을 뿐만 아니라, Y에 근무하게 된 이후에도 피고인 C의 부탁으로 이른바 자금 세탁을 해 준 사실이 있을 뿐, 피해자들을 기망하여 피해자들 로부터 금원을 편취한 사실이 없고, 원심 공동 피고인인 F, G로부터 사단법인 AE( 이하 ‘AE ’라고 한다), AF 교회 및 U 재단 명의의 통장, 도장, 현금카드와 비밀번호를 양수한 사실이 없음에도, 이 사건 공소사실에 대하여 피고인 A을 유죄로 인정한 제 1 원심판결에는 사실을 오인하여 판결에 영향을 미친 잘못이 있다.

2) The punishment sentenced by the lower court to Defendant A (six years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant 1) In the instant charges, the lower court found Defendant 2 guilty of the part concerning Defendant Z as to the charges of this case, which did not err by misapprehending the facts, and thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the facts, thereby adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2) The punishment (two years of imprisonment) imposed by the lower court on the Defendant’s Z is too vague and unfair.

(c)

Defendant

C1) Defendant C believed that the loan was made by Defendant A’s oral statement, and there was no fact that Defendant A conspired with the victims and acquired money from the victims, the lower court found Defendant C guilty of the facts charged in the instant case. In so doing, it erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

(ii)..