logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2019.02.21 2018고단1089
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury) and Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-accident after Accidents) are those engaged in driving a BAWD car;

On October 20, 2018, the Defendant: (a) while driving the said car at around 17:08 and driving the said car on the road in front of the D Driving range C at the Scheon-si on the E-section from the full-time road to the E-section; (b) due to negligence in the course of business, neglecting the Defendant’s duty of care; (c) due to the Defendant’s occupational negligence, the part behind the Defendant’s driving of the victim F (V, South, 44 years old) who stopped for the signal waiting before the direction, resulting in the Defendant’s injury to the victim, such as salt and tension, which requires two-day medical treatment; and (d) at the same time, the victim’s low-speed car and damaged the victim’s repair cost to KRW 595,148.148.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not take necessary measures such as aiding the victim and escaped as it is.

2. 도로교통법위반(음주측정거부) 피고인은 2018. 10. 20. 17:47경 춘천시 H에 있는 I카페 정원에서 “술에 취한 여자가 승용차를 운전하여 카페에 들어와 난리를 치고 있다”는 112신고를 받고 출동한 춘천경찰서 경위 J으로부터, 술 냄새가 나고 비틀거리는 등 피고인이 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어, 3회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구 받았음에도, 호흡을 불어넣는 시늉만 하면서 이에 응하지 아니하여 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구를 정당한 사유없이 거부하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, each traffic accident report, each accident scene photograph, a visual image flag photograph, the site photograph, the accident camera, and the circumstantial statement of the principal driver;

arrow