Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A, Defendant B is not a person who illegally stays in the nationality of each of the Thailand, nor a person who handles narcotics.

1. The Defendant, on March 8, 2018, committed a single crime by Defendant B, should include the Metecaminic composition, which is a local mental medicine, from F, in the street around the E convenience store located in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do around March 8, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as “Neca”).

10,000 won was purchased.

2. Joint crimes committed by the Defendants

A. On March 11, 2018, the Defendants purchased “H” in front of the “H” located in the Sound Group G of Chungcheongbuk-gun, with F, at the same time 700,000 won.

B. From March 15, 2018, the Defendants purchased a gold-line of 700,000 won at the market price from F with F, at the front of the said H, at the same time, F, and at the same time purchased from F, the gold-line of 10,000 won at the market price.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to purchase the F from the F twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect concerning F by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by each prosecutor with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (to attach telephone details);

1. Defendants who choose the pertinent legal provisions and punishment for criminal facts: Articles 60(1)2 and 4(1)1 and 2 subparag. 3(b) of the Narcotics Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Additional collection Defendants: The sentencing reasons under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. appear to have been purchased in the middle of the same factory workers; the Defendants were unlikely to inhale or sell the horses; the Defendants were first offenders; the Defendants appears to be against their mistake; and the Defendants appear to be against their age, sex, environment, circumstances leading up to crimes, means and methods, results, etc.; and the sentence shall be determined as ordered in light of the conditions of sentencing, such as the following circumstances.