1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The decedent C (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on March 18, 2016, and his/her heir was a child, D, Defendant, E, F, Plaintiff, and G. However, upon the death of E on June 24, 2016 while E was aware of marriage, D, Defendant, F, Plaintiff, and G acquired each of 1/5 statutory shares in inheritance.

B. Meanwhile, H apartment I, which was registered in the name of the deceased, was based on the sale on April 7, 2012 (transaction value of KRW 58,00,000), and the ownership transfer registration was completed in the J on April 27, 2012. In Daegu-gu H apartment K, Daegu-gu, which was registered in the name of the deceased, was completed on March 16, 2012 on the ground of donation on March 15, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without any dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1-1-4 and 4-1-4, purport of whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff asserted and determined that since the defendant violated the legal reserve of inheritance of the plaintiff, co-inheritors, who are co-inheritors, by receiving both the purchase price of H apartment I, the deposits of the deceased, and H apartment K, etc. from the deceased, the defendant alleged that the plaintiff should return the legal reserve of inheritance infringed on the plaintiff. However, it is difficult to recognize that the evidence submitted by the plaintiff was that the deceased donated or bequeathed the above money to the defendant, and there is no other evidence

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.