1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,600,000 as well as the annual rate from May 30, 2019 to February 7, 2020, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The sales contract between the Defendant and the Korea Land and Housing Corporation 1) The real estate owned by the Defendant is an ancient C public housing zone development project implemented by the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “instant project”).

(2) On January 7, 2016, the Defendant was designated as a person eligible for sale of migrants’ housing site from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation. On or around December 7, 2016, the Defendant entered into a contract with the Korea Land and Housing Corporation to purchase the migrants’ housing site (land number: D, temporary lot number: E, location: F large scale 234mm2, and designated use: 200,500m2,00 won from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

B. On the other hand, around January 15, 2015, before entering into the instant sales contract, the Defendant entered into a contract for the transfer of the right to sell the leased housing site (hereinafter “instant sales right”) and the right to sell the housing site of migrants to be acquired in the future with respect to the instant business (hereinafter “instant sales right”).

(1) The term “transfer contract of this case” (hereinafter referred to as “transfer contract of this case”)

A) Around April 23, 2015, G entered into a contract with H to re-transfer the instant sales right (hereinafter “instant transfer contract”).

C. The circumstances leading up to the conclusion of the contract of delegation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the content thereof 1) among the residents selected as the subject of relocation measures, several persons entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to transfer the right to purchase the leased housing site to another person. After that, the purchaser of the right to purchase the leased housing site or the subsequent purchaser intended to file a lawsuit seeking the implementation of the procedure for change of the name of the right to purchase the leased housing site, and the number of buyers of the leased housing site entered into a contract with the Plaintiff under the initiative of the Plaintiff to respond thereto. 2) Accordingly, the Defendant also entered into a contract with the Plaintiff on January