Defendant

A A Fines 1,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine of 500,000 won, Defendant C’s fine of 700,000 won, and Defendant D.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants and K’s co-principal L awarded a contract to the construction business operator M for the remodeling work of the “Ncare center in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon.” The above M subcontracted part of the construction work to the Defendants. When civil litigation was initiated due to disputes over the construction cost between the above M and the victim, the above M did not pay part of the construction cost to the Defendants.

Defendants and K et al. are the defendants et al.

The victim claimed that he received the claim for the construction price from the above M and claimed the payment of the construction price. However, the Defendants rejected the request. The Defendants pressured the victim by doing one demonstration or posting a banner before the childcare center operated by the victim, etc., and received the construction price.

The following year in which the defendant, etc. interfering with business, in collusion, manufactures banners and diskettes to be used for one person's demonstration on or around January 24, 201;

1. From around 10:25 on January 25, 25

2. Until August 2, 200, the truck owned by Defendant G was parked with a banner stating the phrase “the head of the child-care center L is to solve construction wages and operate the child-care center” attached to the truck owned by Defendant G in front of the above child-care center, and the Defendants continued to spread, and the phrase “the head of the child-care center is to break down the name of the head of the child-care center, who is to break down the wages of the head of the child-care center, and is removed by us at the child-care center built on the child-care center.” From the construction cost half, the head of the infanted child-care center operated by the inside and outside of the construction cost, she interfered with the affairs of the victim’s child-care center operation by force by putting it on the kicket stating the phrase “the name of the head of the child-care center, which

B. The Defendant’s defamation et al. conspired with the Defendant to the effect that the victim would not unfairly pay part of the construction cost in the street where many unspecified persons pass through the same time or at the same place.