logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.10 2017구단50192
반환명령 및 추가징수 결정 등 취소
Text

1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiffs are all representatives of child-care centers, and the plaintiffs are employers, and the F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "F").

(2) After entering into an entrustment training contract with a workplace care teacher, a document prepared by the workplace care teacher meeting the requirements for the completion of the entrusted training to F and submitted to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea to the Human Resources Development Service of Korea for compensating for the training expenses (Article 8 of the Employment Insurance Act, the Ministry of Employment and Labor shall attend at least 80% of the training hours and complete the training course.

[2] Specifically, Plaintiff A (the representative of the G Child Care Center) conducted on May 26, 2012 to February 24, 2014, three of his/her child care teachers (the total number of 87 persons per annum), including the “G Child Care Center”, and (2) Plaintiff B (the representative of H Child Care Center) conducted on July 18, 2012 to March 17, 2014, including the total number of 34 infant care teachers (the total number of 139 persons per annum), ③ conducted on the total number of 130 and 27 infant care teachers, including the total number of 10 and 17 infant care teachers (the total number of 20 and 15 infant care teachers) conducted on September 18, 2012 to March 17, 2014.

B. In the course of the investigation into F, which is an entrusted training institution, the Incheon Bupyeong Police Station rendered a prior payment to the Plaintiffs, even if the business owner of the 488 childcare center, including the Plaintiff, did not pay the training fee.

arrow