Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A Co., Ltd., and B, jointly and severally 365,255,930 won and the foregoing:
B. Defendant C is above.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 27, 2011, Defendant A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) entered into a new construction contract received a contract from Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Ycheon-gu”) for the new construction of F Welfare Center.
(hereinafter “instant construction contract”). B.
(1) In order to secure the implementation of the instant construction contract on October 27, 201, the Defendant Company concluded an insurance coverage amounting to 280,295,700 won, the insured, and the Geumcheon-gu insurance period from October 27, 201 to September 20, 201, and (2) an insurance coverage amounting to 200,556,220 won, the insured, and the Geumcheon-gu insurance period, to guarantee the repayment of advance payment under the instant construction contract on November 8, 201, in order to guarantee the return of advance payment under the instant construction contract, the Defendant Company agreed to pay the insurance coverage amount in addition to the interest rate prescribed by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “instant guarantee agreement”) from November 8, 2011 to November 19, 2012.
(2) Defendant B, the representative director of the Defendant Company, was jointly and severally and severally and severally liable for the obligation owed by each Defendant Company to the Plaintiff under the first guarantee contract of this case.
C. On October 15, 2012, while the Defendant Company was performing the construction work under the instant construction contract, it submitted a letter of waiver of construction work to the Geumcheon-gu that the said construction work would be waived.
The payment of the plaintiff's insurance money to the plaintiff around October 2012 and around November 2012, Geumcheon-gu follows the first and second guarantee contract of this case on the ground that the defendant company renounces the construction of the defendant company and the subsequent termination of the construction contract of this case.