The punishment of the accused shall be set forth in six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 06:00 on August 11, 2012, the Defendant driven a 2 km B otobb in front of the bus bus stops at the same time-on-on-on-way front of the Do government office distance, from the front of the Do government office distance in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and from the front of the Do government office distance, around 06:00, the Defendant used the blood alcohol concentration of 0.19%.

2. Around the time and time indicated in the preceding paragraph, the injured Defendant driven the off-to-land of the passenger car in the vicinity of the bus stop located in the Hanwon-si Port. Around the time and time, the injured Defendant driven the above off-to-land of the passenger car in the vicinity of the bus stop located in the Hanwon-si Port. The injured Defendant driven the D non-Mable passenger car after driving it on the above off-to-land and driving it on the off-land. The injured Defendant 1: (a) driven the above vehicle in front of the above vehicle while driving it on the off-to-land; and (b) driven the above vehicle in front of the above vehicle while driving it on the off-to-land; and (c) caused the injured party’s body several times to prevent the injured party from getting out of the above vehicle; and (d) caused the injured party’s injury that requires treatment for about three weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Acts and subordinate statutes as a copy of a report on detection of a driver of the driving of the driving of the driving of the driving of the driver, a report on the circumstances

1. Relevant laws concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury) (the choice of imprisonment, respectively);

1. From among concurrent crimes, Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act [the minimum of the punishment shall be within the scope of aggregating the maximum term of the above two crimes, but the minimum of the punishment shall be determined by the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. According to the sentencing guidelines published by the Supreme Court sentencing committee, this case is a violation of the Road Traffic Act in which the sentencing guidelines set for the crime of injury was not set (the crime of drinking and the crime of concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal