beta
Text
1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) shall deliver to the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff) the motor vehicle listed in the attached list to C.
2...
Reasons
1. Judgment on the plaintiff's main claim
A. On April 23, 2018, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff purchased an automobile listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant automobile”) from the network D (hereinafter “the network”) to KRW 5 million (the contract amount of KRW 300,000,000 and the remainder of KRW 4.7 million).
On the other hand, the deceased died on July 19, 2018, and as his inheritor’s children, the Defendants are obligated to implement the procedure for ownership transfer registration for each of the instant vehicles’ 1/2 shares to the Plaintiff.
B. (1) The establishment of the authenticity of the seal imprinted by the holder’s seal imprinted by the relevant legal doctrine is presumed, barring any special circumstance, if the authenticity of the seal imprinted by his/her seal imprinted by his/her seal imprinted, barring any special circumstance. Once the authenticity of the seal imprinted is presumed, the authenticity of the entire document is presumed pursuant to Article 358 of the Civil Procedure Act. However, the presumption that the authenticity of the seal imprinted by the holder’s intent to make the seal imprinted is de facto presumed. As such, the presumption of the authenticity of the seal imprinted is broken if the person disputing the authenticity of the seal imprinted by the court proves circumstances that the act of affixing the seal
(2) In light of the legal principles as to the establishment of the authenticity of a disposal document, the existence of an expression of intent and its contents should be acknowledged in accordance with the content of the document, unless there is any clear and acceptable counter-proof that the content of the document is denied if the authenticity of the document is recognized, and in light of the fact that the holder of the disposal document is presumed to use the document’s seal upon delegation by the holder of the document’s name on his/her duty or by relationship of relatives, it should be careful in estimating the authenticity of the document’s document’s authenticity, and in particular, if it is proved that the holder of the disposal document was delegated by the holder of the document’s
(See Supreme Court Decision 2014Da29667 Decided September 26, 2014, etc.). (2)