logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2020.10.27 2020가단201776
보수금반환 청구
Text

The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On July 1, 2003, the Plaintiff was employed as Grade 10 clerical staff at C High Schools (D High Schools before the change; hereinafter “instant schools”) operated by the Defendant, and served as an employee of the administrative office of the instant schools until now.

The Defendant, while employing the Plaintiff, recognized the Plaintiff’s work experience from January 7, 1997 to October 30, 200, and from August 27, 2001 to June 10, 2003, as a similar work experience (hereinafter “the work experience in this case”), recognized the Plaintiff’s work experience of class 1 construction machinery engineer (former construction machinery equipment engineer) in the situation of the Korea Teachers Pension Corporation (former construction machinery equipment engineer) and identified the beginning salary class as class 8 of class 10 in technical service by recognizing the Plaintiff’s work experience of class 80 per cent during the above work period.

On August 28, 2012, the Plaintiff submitted to the principal of the instant case a request for the conversion rate of the career experience in the instant case pertaining to the period from July 2003 to August 2012 due to the extension of the scope of recognition of work experience in the private sector related to similar work experience by the amendment of the Local Public Officials Remuneration Regulations, and submitted the “application for the addition of the period of work experience for the determination of salary grade” with the content that the conversion rate of work experience in the instant case pertaining to the period from July 2003 to August 20, 2012, and re-defined the Plaintiff’s salary class from September 1, 2

From July 10, 2017 to July 21, 2017, the Minister of Education conducted a comprehensive audit on various levels of schools, etc. under the jurisdiction of the Superintendent of the Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education, including the Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education and the pertinent school, and on February 7, 2018, the Superintendent of the Busan Metropolitan Office of Education, and the defendant, on July 1, 2003, recognized the plaintiff as a 10th class officer of the instant school, and defined the plaintiff's beginning salary class of the plaintiff as a 10th class of the technical career of the private enterprise, which cannot be recognized as a similar career of the plaintiff as a 10th class of the technical career of the instant school, and defined it as a 10th class of the technical career class of the plaintiff as a 8th class of the 10th class of the technical career of the private enterprise. After that, the plaintiff was not held on September 1, 2012.

arrow