1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the “Federation” under Section 10 of Article 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance as the “Federation of Banks”; and (b) the Defendant’s assertion in the trial is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition of the following determination as to the matters alleged in the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of

【Additional Determination Matters】

A. The summary of the defendant's assertion is from January 27, 2006 to March 25, 2006 that the defendant repaid to the non-party company all the amounts borrowed from the non-party company.

Therefore, due to the plaintiff's subrogation, the plaintiff's claim for indemnity against the defendant cannot be created.

B. From January 27, 2006 to March 25, 2006, it is not sufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant fully repaid the funds borrowed from the non-party company to the non-party company on the sole basis of the statements in the evidence Nos. 6 and 7 (limited to the details that the Defendant or the former husband D remitted the money to E). There is no other evidence to acknowledge this differently.

Therefore, the defendant's argument is without merit to further examine.

2. In conclusion, the first instance judgment is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.