logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.04.24 2014가단258975
임금
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

On February 26, 2013, the Plaintiffs: (a) at the auction of Defendant F8/10 and Defendant G2/10 shares, the Defendants owned 8/10 shares of the eight-class hotel above H of the old Si-si (hereinafter “instant hotel”); and (b) the same year.

3. 18. On March 15, 2013, Plaintiff B had Plaintiff B perform the interior interior interior of the instant hotel, and the Plaintiffs, including Plaintiff B, including Plaintiff B, were the same year from March 15, 2013.

7. Until 30.30., the Defendants asserted that the Defendants are obligated to pay the amount of each claim to the Plaintiffs, but the Defendants had the Plaintiffs perform the work of interior interior interior interior of the hotel of this case.

Since there is no evidence to acknowledge that the contract was made for the payment of the price, the plaintiffs' claims are without merit.

The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

arrow