logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.07.06 2015나2002759
부당이득금 반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (i) The Defendant is the owner of each real estate, machinery, structure, etc. as indicated in the separate sheet in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 434, 363-4, 388, and 592 (hereinafter “instant loan property”).

Luxembourg entrusted the Korea Asset Management Corporation with the authority to manage and dispose of the instant loan property, which is State property, and on February 20, 2009, the Korea Asset Management Corporation registered the public announcement of the instant loan property (hereinafter “instant public announcement of the public announcement”).

Article 25(1) of the Civil Procedure Act provides that the public notice of this case shall be given as follows.

The bidder executive agency and the Korea Asset Management Corporation in charge of the real estate disposal method (loan) rental method for kinds of basic information goods used as a site for the past KT&G Central Research Institute's raw materials, research institutes, and research institutes in the area of land 329,345 square meters in the area of land, 434, 363-4, 38, 592 square meters in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the location of information on goods A, and 329,345 square meters in the area of land, and all of the buildings (38 points) are included in a loan bid, and are included in an urban area, natural green area, and natural green area, and thus, the first rent (31,101,13,400, 400, 160, 2000, 160, 160, 270, 160, 201.

B. (i) The Plaintiff participated in the said bidding and was selected as a successful bidder on March 6, 2009, and between the Korea Asset Management Corporation and the Defendant on March 6, 2009, and between March 6, 2009 and March 5, 2014, the Plaintiff’s loan of this case from the Defendant to KRW 450,000,000, value-added tax, and KRW 32,347,000.

arrow