1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:00 on May 31, 2012, the Defendant: (a) removed the victim’s complaint that the victim reported the Defendant to the police, and then damaged the victim’s above 1,70,000 won at the market price by breaking off the wheeling car owned by the victim, which was parked in the front place of the police; (b) destroying the above bitr at the market price by destroying the front door of the driver’s seat of the said car; and (c) destroying the bitr at the front door of the said car with the gate by removing the 200,000 won at the market price installed in the said car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site and photographs of damage, investigation reports (or relative investigations of victims, etc.), investigation reports, and investigation reports;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order pursuant to Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, confessions of the crime with reason for sentencing, the fact that there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine is more favorable. However, considering the fact that the previous convictions led to the crime of this case at least three times, the same victim is committing the crime repeatedly, the same crime is committing the crime, and the nature of the crime is poor, the sentence was determined as ordered by taking into account the following factors: the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, and circumstances after the crime.