beta
Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
Some of the facts charged were corrected.
The defendant is a person who works in B as a business member.
피고인은 2016. 3. 4. 04:00 경 부산 해운대구 좌동 농협 맞은편 공영 주차장 보도 블록에서 동종 업계에 근무하는 피해자 C(37 세) 과 영업에 관하여 말다툼을 하던 중 피해자가 가슴을 손바닥으로 밀쳤다는 이유로 “ 깽 값( 치료비) 줄게 한번 맞아야 되겠다" 고 하면서 오른손바닥으로 피해자의 왼쪽 뺨을 3대 때리고 서로 양팔을 잡고 당기고 밀치고 하다가 길가에 같이 넘어져 뒹구는 등으로 피해자를 폭행하였다.
Judgment
The facts charged in the instant case fall under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the express will of the victim pursuant to Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
According to the records, it is recognized that a written agreement, after July 29, 2016, on November 3, 2017, stating that the defendant does not want to be punished, was submitted to this court.
Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since it constitutes a case in which a victim’s express intent not to prosecute a crime is expressed.