A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:20 on October 20, 2015, the Defendant attempted to threaten the victim to reverse the statement by threatening the victim, on the ground that the victim D drafted a written confirmation in relation to the criminal case of the Defendant, etc., on the ground that the victim D drafted a written confirmation in relation to the Defendant’s criminal case, the Defendant attempted to threaten the victim to commit an act for which the victim is not obliged to reverse the statement by threatening the victim, such as “I want to cancel the written confirmation with the same effect that D was written before the police station. 3rd 2, 3rd 2, 3rd 2, 100. He will pass through the graduate after hearing too much lessons, and if the width fails to do so.” However, the victim refused to do so and attempted to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. Recording notes;

1. Application of telephone content CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 1(2) of the pertinent Act on criminal facts and Articles 324-5 and 324(1) of the Criminal Act [The crime of coercion, which is the means of imprisonment or coercion, notifies the victim of harm and injury likely to be drinking to the extent that the freedom of decision-making is restricted, or that it interferes with the freedom of decision-making. In a case where the perpetrator asks the other party for a certain demand based on his/her occupation, status, etc. and does not comply with such demand, the perpetrator is also exposed to harm and injury (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2010Do1374, Apr. 11, 2013; 2010Do1374, Apr. 11, 2013; 8-9, 34, 1112-39-112, 12-15-12-14-15-17, 15-14-17, 15-27, 15-17.