The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Error 1) The Defendant merely left the victim’s front flaps, and did not use flaps and flaps, and even if not, the victim’s injury was in accordance with spathn, and thus is irrelevant to the Defendant’s assault. 2) Since the Defendant merely believed the content of the statement to be true and did not recognize that it was false, the Defendant did not have the intent of defamation by publicly alleging false facts.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the assertion of mistake of facts, ① the victim has consistently made a statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below regarding the content of the assault and the situation before and after the victim's balthm, etc.; ② the victim's balthm of the front and rear balth of the victim's balth as a result of the assault, which is sufficient for the victim to suffer injury because the degree of the assault is not easy; ③ the victim's balthm of the front balth of the victim's balthm of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the balth of the b.