logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.01.10 2019구합74843
징계처분취소 등 청구
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiffs and H are students who were enrolled in the second year at public school at the time of the occurrence of the subject case as seen below (hereinafter “instant school”).

(Plaintiff A was enrolled in the second grade 11, the fourth grade for Plaintiff D, and the second grade 6 for H). The Defendant is the principal of the school of this case.

B. The details of the subject case are as follows.

1) On June 20, 2019, Plaintiff D 1, on June 20, 2019, walked with a male toilet located on the third floor in the Dong Office of the instant school around time.

H In addition, Plaintiff D was brought to a male toilet, and on this matter, Plaintiff D argued that “H was followed and her only followed while having no distance of one meter,” and that “H was said to continue to run, but only she was said to be a cleaning agent, but last, she was said to be a sprinking of water (No. 1st of No. 1) and then followed Plaintiff D.

However, as to this, H made a statement that “I had a toilet more, I had the Plaintiff D’s head, and called “I had the Plaintiff D’s head,” and that I tried to enter the match toilet, I had the Plaintiff’s own water dusted,” unlike Plaintiff D’s assertion, stated otherwise as to the motive that I followed Plaintiff D. In the case of the male toilet front CCTV (No. 2 evidence No. 2-1) that took the situation at the time, H took the hand of another student’s head, who was suffering from hald, and said, H did not make any special conversation or contact with Plaintiff D in addition to Plaintiff D’s head, who followed Plaintiff D’s second-hand, and that he did not have any special conversation or contact with Plaintiff D’s head, who had the h’s head, who was suffering from hald.

arrow