logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2018.10.11 2017가합202767
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. F and the Defendant came to know about about 18 years prior to the instant lawsuit, and became aware of about 10 years prior to the instant lawsuit, and F, upon diagnosis of waste cancer around 2013, was living together with the Defendant.

B. On May 23, 2017, the Defendant withdrawn KRW 150,000,000 from F’s G cooperatives passbook, KRW 120,000,000 on July 24, 2017, and KRW 100,000 on May 23, 2017, respectively.

C. Around November 2017, F filed a complaint against the Defendant on the charge that the Defendant embezzled the above KRW 370,000,000, and the prosecutor of the Cheongju District Prosecutors’ Office rendered a disposition on November 30, 2017 to the Defendant “incompetence of evidence” against the Defendant.

The F died on December 18, 2017, and the F’s heir is the Plaintiff B, C, and Plaintiff D, who is the legal wife.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4, 12, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the grounds of claim

A. 1) The summary of the plaintiffs' assertion 1) from around 2013, F had lived with the defendant, and the defendant had the F had the intention to run the F's construction business. The defendant had the F's intent to work while managing F's passbook. The defendant withdrawn a total of KRW 370,00,000 from F's passbook using F's password, which was known in the process. Ultimately, as the defendant had withdrawn money without F's permission, the defendant had withdrawn money without F's permission, thereby making compensation for damages based on the illegal act, and the defendant had the duty to recognize the above amount of KRW 82,22,222,22, and 30,000 from F's passbook to the plaintiff Eul, who is F's heir, the plaintiff Eul, the plaintiff Eul, and D, and each of the above amounts, and the defendant had the obligation to pay the F's total amount of damages from July 24, 2017 to the date of full payment.

arrow