Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A As a business owner, Defendant B conspired as an employee and provided a large number of unspecified customers with the revised "37 Game" (337 Bads, 337 Mads, 337 Mads, 337 Mads, 337 Mads, 337 Mads, 37 Mads, 37 Mads, 37 Mads, 37 Mads, and 37 Mads, which are different from the classification of the classification of the classification.

As a result, the Defendants provided customers with game contents different from the rating classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Some statements made to the defendant A in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect;

1. Some statements concerning the Defendants in the police interrogation protocol

1. Police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. A report on investigation, and replies to the results of appraisal;

1. Data of each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (investigative records No. 86-87, amnesty), investigation report (in the case of police officersF statement hearing);

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: Articles 45 subparag. 4 and 32 subparag. 2 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act