logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.21 2014가합5918
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant Bobn Annb’s 77,00.00 oil supply to Plaintiff Stima franchises eldi, respectively.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The Plaintiff’s status as a party

) S. L. S. L. (hereinafter referred to as “S. L.B.”) in the P.S. S. Republic of Korea

) A bareboat charter with respect to the instant vessel was concluded, and the instant vessel was handed over on January 31, 2012, and operated on delivery of the instant vessel. 2) The Plaintiff was a Spanish corporation operating marine insurance business, etc., which entered into an insurance contract with the Plaintiff Syma or Syna, and the said two companies as the insured.

3) Defendant Two Engine Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Two Engine”).

) The Corporation is a Korean legal entity that engages in the design, manufacture, sale, installation, remodeling, etc. of vessel engines, etc., and MaN B & 6 S70 ME-C8.1 Engine (hereinafter “instant engine”).

(4) Defendant 1 (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) designed the instant engine as a Denmark corporation that engages in design, manufacture, repair, etc. of vessel engines, etc.

B. Around June 15, 2012, from around June 19, 2012 to June 19, 2012, Plaintiff Stima had been experienced seven times in the phenomenon where the operating speed of the instant engine was lowered or the engine was suspended. While the instant engine was sailing only between the coast of France and the Northwest coast of Spain, Plaintiff Stima discontinued suspended the operation of the instant vessel on the sea near only the Ssna on June 17:54, 2012 (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Around 14:00 on June 20, 2012, Defendant 2: (a) on board the instant vessel and accepted the instant engine; and (b) so far, Plaintiff 2 towing boat (VB gas Co., Ltd., VBascogne, and Sinninis).

arrow