All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant A’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted Defendant A of the charge of embezzlement of shareholder dividend on the part of the facts charged against Defendant A, and of the proof of breach of trust.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the illegal solicitation of embezzlement, illegal acquisition intent, and the crime of embezzlement.

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of Defendant C’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court was justifiable to have found Defendant C guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning.

In doing so, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on illegal solicitation of taking property in breach of trust.

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.