logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2015.09.09 2014가단42915
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

On January 201, the Plaintiff accepted the steel-frame mold work from the Defendant during the construction of the D D D D D D D D D’s wages of KRW 113,700,000,000,000,000 for the construction cost. Moreover, the Plaintiff was obligated to pay KRW 163,750,000 for the cleaning cost from the first floor to the third floor above the ground, and the Defendant was obligated to pay KRW 1,450,000 for the Plaintiff’s account, KRW 3,50,000,000,000 for the lodging deposit, KRW 3,50,000,000,000 for the Human D’s wages of KRW 113,70,000,000 for the construction cost, and KRW 50,505,000 for the remainder of the construction cost.

On February 8, 2011, the Plaintiff was subcontracted with the Defendant with the steel-frame molding construction cost of KRW 150 million, among the new construction works of the Cridge in Pakistan-si, Pakistan-si. However, there is no dispute between the parties. However, there is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff additionally paid KRW 10 million from the Defendant to the third floor, and the cleaning cost of KRW 5 million from the first floor to the third floor above the ground. There is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff’s construction cost exceeds KRW 137,900,000,000 already paid, as seen below.

Rather, comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions and arguments in Gap evidence 1, 2, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 8 (including each number), the plaintiff did not complete the subcontracted construction work from the defendant, and suspended construction around August 201, and the defendant paid the plaintiff totaling KRW 137,90,000,00, including security deposit for accommodation, food, and human resource wages, etc. from February 10, 201 to August 26, 201; the fact that the defendant completed the construction work in excess of KRW 18,30,000,000, including additional expenses, after the suspension of construction.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow