A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

. The victims complained against the victims on the ground that the victims could not enter the said restaurant by avoiding the disturbance of several times in the F cafeteria, making a false report on the victims D, at the F cafeteria.

1. On the first day of April 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 10:00 on the first day of April 2016, the victim D, in front of G Mart located adjacent to the above restaurant, shall be discarded by the Defendant.

Poters in the Gangseo Police Station are located in the canter.

p. He shall not live in this nete.

10,000,000

shall be discarded.

“Abrupted the victim,” and threatened the victim.

2. At around 11:00 on April 14, 2016, the Defendant: “Around 11:00, the Defendant shall send and deliver to the victim D this son’s imprisonment” at the same place. The Defendant’s death shall be discarded.

“Abrupted the victim,” and threatened the victim.

3. On April 19, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 18:40 on April 19, 2016, to the victim E “PR and the deceased.”

Ethical par value death.

In the same year, “I ambling,” and intimidation the said victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Previous conviction: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about criminal history and report criminal investigation (report attaching a sentence of judgment);

1. Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravation of concurrent crimes [the scope of recommended punishment] The basic area (2.1 year - year - February - 1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Terrorism : February -1 year - October - the defendant committed this case during the period of repeated crimes - the defendant committed this case without any reason to obtain different payments; the victim was threatened; the degree of intimidation is not easy; the defendant is sentenced to a sentence in that the defendant is able to repent up in depth and live in the future.

It is so decided as per Disposition in consideration of all the sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the defendant's wife is well-being, the age of the defendant, etc.