The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflected his mistake, and there are circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the instant crime.

However, during the period of repeated crimes, the Defendant participated in the instant crime, and the instant crime itself is not only an act that undermines the trust and safety of financial transactions, but also an act that is used for a large-scale financial fraud crime such as scam, etc., and its nature is very good.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances surrounding the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., it is not recognized that the lower court’s punishment is unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.