All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to Defendant C’s final appeal, Defendant C did not submit a statement of reason for final appeal within the statutory period, and the petition of final appeal does not indicate the reason for final appeal.

2. According to Article 383 subparag. 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act as to the grounds for appeal by Defendant A, M, and N, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is imposed, but only in cases where imprisonment with or without prison labor for not less than ten years is granted, an appeal may be filed on the grounds of unfair sentencing. As such, the argument that a more minor sentence against Defendant A, M, and N is too unreasonable is

3. Examining the reasoning of Defendant K’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that Defendant K was guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the relevant legal doctrine, contrary to what is alleged in

4. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.