beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
When the driver of any motor vehicle drives the motor vehicle, he/she shall fasten the seat belt, and make the passenger seated beside him/her fasten the safety seat belt.
Nevertheless, on October 14, 2015, the Defendant driven CA car without being fastening the safety seat belt from the white light distance located in the Bupyeong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do.
Summary of Evidence
1. Each legal statement about witness D and E;
1. Statement made by the police against D;
1. A self-statement (E) (the defendant was fastening the safety seat belt at the time of the instant case;
However, according to the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the following circumstances are found as follows: (i) the first control place is closed at the right angle, and it appears that the speed of the vehicle passing through the place was considerably slow; (ii) even if the defendant's police statement was based on the defendant's police statement, the vehicle of the defendant was not cut to the extent that the driver well sees even before 10 meters, and it seems difficult for the defendant to confirm whether the first control person wear the safety seat belt of the defendant; and (iii) it appears difficult for the defendant to confirm whether the first control person wears the safety seat belt of the defendant; (iv) E was from the investigative agency to this court to check that the defendant did not fasten the safety seat belt at the time; and (v) it was hard for the defendant to check the safety seat belt of the defendant to D.
In light of the fact that: (a) the Defendant is sufficiently recognized to not fastening the seat belt at the time of the instant case; (b) the Defendant stopped the Defendant’s vehicle without the seat belt; and (c) the Defendant attempted to fasten the Defendant’s seat belt at the time of the instant case from the investigative agency to this court; and (d) the Defendant made a relatively consistent statement to the effect that she would talk about one time after recognizing the fact that the Defendant did not wear the seat belt. Therefore, the above assertion by the Defendant is not acceptable).