A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 12:53 October 27, 2016, the defendant of "2017 Highest 481" to the victim F in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E “Nehnbbbbage.”

The term "years" and the term "years" threatened the victim's face, which is a dangerous object in advance, as the victim's face.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

on September 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 18:00 on September 7, 2017, the Defendant: (b) the victim C, a police official belonging to the H District police station belonging to the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G in front of G; (c) the reporter of the 112; (d) the Gu office housing and employees, etc. are deemed to have “this labor farb, me, me, me, me, me, me, farch, farched, farched, farch

The victims were openly insulting, such as referring to “this labor brut”.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 481]

1. Statement made by the witness F in the protocol outside the trial of the person on August 16, 2017;

1. Statement made by a witness B among the protocol outside the trial of the person on August 16, 2017;

1. A written statement;

1. Photographs of the skin (2017 Height 4403);

1. Statement made by C by the witness among the six-time public trial records;

1. To state some of the witness I's statements in the sixth public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A written statement of I;

1. C’s statement of accusation (the Defendant did not pose a threat to the victim F by inserting in connection with a special crime of intimidation, and asserts that the Defendant only contested the reporter with regard to the insulting crime, and that there was no hump to the police officer.

However, on August 16, 2017, the statement of the witness F in the statement of the witness in the outside of the trial record (the defendant inserted and the witness's face was displayed as the witness's face would be biased).

The police officer called up at the time when the victim's statement was made without any particular material to reject credibility, also the defendant threatened the victim by inserting it.

When examining the stated circumstances, it can be recognized that the defendant has threatened the victim F with inserting face as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment.

In addition, the witness C in the sixth trial protocol.