A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant: (b) obstructed the Defendant: (c) resisted the Victim C (71) (hereinafter “Del”); (d) resisted the Victim C (71) with air conditioners and hot water; (b) 306, which was operated by the Defendant on December 29, 2014; (c) caused the Victim’s face at a time; and (d) caused the Victim’s failure by taking the victim’s face at one time; and (d) the Victim, depending on the Victim, was fluenced with the victim, “Y Y Y Y Y Y Y, Y Y Y Y

The cleaning theory was expressed in a large voice of several minutes, such as "I immediately d," etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's maternity business by force.

2. On December 29, 2014, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, who received 112 reports at the places indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) around December 29, 2014 and received questioning of the circumstances, etc. of the instant case from Fman, a police officer affiliated with the E District Police Station E District of the Daejeon Police Station (26 years old), who was called “F, the age of the police officer?”

p. Doeser????????????’’

G security guards, the police officers of the same police station, who control the Defendant, were able to take a bath of "influence of the death of the dog," and the head was fluence of F's face, and the end of G security guards, the police officers of the same police station, who control the Defendant from the next side, was 46 years of head at one time.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning F, G's on-site dispatch and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. The first written protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C, G, and F;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigative report (record 118 pages);

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties);

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

4. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act for the aggravation of concurrent crimes [the scope of recommended punishment] and the grounds for obstructing the performance of official duties. The basic area (fe.g., June to April and April, and the sentencing criteria are not set.