logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.03.26 2020가단5202589
집행문부여의 소
Text

D With regard to the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013 Gaz. 5594918 Doz.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Applicable legal provisions;

(a) Articles 208(3)2, 150(3) and 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (a) (a judgment deemed a confession);

B. The Defendant received a duplicate of the instant complaint and submitted a written answer, but the written answer does not clearly state the purport of clearly disputing the fact that the Plaintiff asserted as the cause of the claim.

In addition, the defendant did not appear on the date of pleading even after being notified of the date not subject to publication service, and did not submit a written response that clearly contests the plaintiff's assertion.

Therefore, it is deemed that the plaintiff made a confession.

arrow