logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.01.17 2018고정1152
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months by imprisonment with prison labor for an injury at the Seoul Northern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 5, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 11:30 on January 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed an act of assaulting the victim’s face, chest, neck, and neck on the ground that the victim E (the 47-year-old age-old age-old) was set up in the Council-si B of the Gyeonggi-si; (b) on the ground that the victim E (the 47-year-old age-old) was set up in the side, and committed an act of assaulting the victim’s face, chest, neck, neck, neck, and her head once.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. A report on the result of confirmation before and after the disposition, the defendant asserts that a copy of the judgment was only an assault from the victim and the surrounding persons, and that there was no intentional assault by the victim, and even if the fact of assault is recognized, it constitutes legitimate self-defense or legitimate act.

However, the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, (i) D, who had engaged in fishing at the next place on the ground that the Defendant was engaged in fishing, was refunded the charge to the president of the fishing place, and (ii) D, in the investigation agency and this court, stated that “at the time of fishing, the Defendant was faced with the fishing age, and the Defendant was able to know because he was able to know,” and (iii) in the investigation agency and this court, the victim stated that “the Defendant and D were frighted, and the Defendant continued to fright, and the Defendant was frighted and frighted,” and stated that “The Defendant was frighted and frighted in the course of leaving the Defendant fright at the time when she was frighted.”

arrow