logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.02.13 2018가단216459
부동산인도 등
Text

1. The Defendants each real estate indicated in the separate sheet and the obstacles installed on the ground of the real estate indicated in the separate sheet to the Plaintiff, respectively.

Reasons

The plaintiff is a housing redevelopment project partnership that has been established with the area of the project, the area of which is 103,429.8 square meters in the Dong-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon as a project implementation district.

The Plaintiff obtained authorization to establish an association on April 6, 2015, authorization to implement the project on June 7, 2017, and obtained authorization to implement the project on February 26, 2018 from the head of the Daejeon Metropolitan City Dong-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City (hereinafter referred to as “instant authorization to implement the administrative disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition disposition

Attached Form

Each real estate listed in the list is that the net I acquired ownership after purchasing on May 26, 1979 by the net I.

(E) On March 6, 1993, I left the Defendants and died on the attached list No. 2, which is a house (the real estate indicated in the attached list No. 2, which is a house).

The Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the local Land Tribunal of Daejeon Metropolitan City where the Defendants did not consult on the compensation for losses.

On October 12, 2018, the above local land expropriation committee decided the commencement date of expropriation as of November 13, 2018, and decided to expropriate each real estate in the attached list owned and occupied by the Defendants, and its obstacles.

(B) On November 12, 2018, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 107,631,550 for the Defendants according to the instant expropriation ruling.

[Reasons] Under the main text of Article 81(1) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), without dispute, A2-4, A3 through A7, A8-4, A9, A10, A11-1, and A12 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), when a management and disposal plan is authorized and publicly announced, the right holder, such as the owner of the previous land or building, can not use or benefit from the previous land or building until the date of public announcement of transfer under Article 86 of the same Act, and the project implementer can use or benefit from the plan.

When the management and disposal plans prescribed by the Urban Improvement Act are authorized and publicly announced, the former land or buildings shall be made.

arrow