The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged was destroyed by the Defendant, around December 2010 and around February 201, 201, to March 201, 201, by cutting off three girs influoral trees in China at the market price, which is the common property owned by the said apartment owners of 505 Dong-dong apartment buildings, and preventing the absorption of water by cutting off and cutting down the cirs around February 2012.

2. The defendant asserts that the defendant's assertion that there is no enemy to sworn trees as stated in the facts charged from the investigative agency to the court, and that there is only a change of spawn trees in the chemical group.

3. Determination

A. There is only a statement in D’s investigative agency and this court as evidence that the Defendant, as shown in the facts charged, destroyed 3 glus by killing 3 glus as well as the fact that the Defendant destroyed 3 glus.

Therefore, as to its credibility, D, at the time of the police investigation, showed that the Defendant was fluordial trees between 05:00 on December 2010 and 06:00, and thereafter, between 05:00 and 06:00 on March 2011 and 06:0 on March 201, the Defendant was fludial trees, and the Defendant was fludial trees from 05:00 on March 201 to 06:0 on March 201, and the Defendant was fludial trees, and at the time was fludous.

“A statement was made to the effect that “the head of the management office and the husband of one’s husband were killed, but the Defendant was sworn with a certain method” (Article 2:37,38 of the Investigation Records), and the prosecutor’s office stated to the effect that “the Defendant was shotfing a prone tree between 06:00 and 06:30, and that it was the same as that of the Defendant’s cutting off a prone tree, and that it is not well memory (Article 1 of the Investigation Records No. 34 of the Investigation Records), but the detailed statement to the effect that it is a witness in this Court.”