A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2019. 2. 17. 00:50경 경주시 B에 있는 ‘C’ 주점에서, “여자들끼리 가라오케에서 소란을 피운다.”라는 112신고를 받고 출동한 D파출소 소속 경찰관 경장 E으로부터 사건 경위에 대한 질문을 받자 화가 나 E에게 “씹할, 왜 왔노, 꺼져라.”라고 욕설을 하면서 오른손으로 E이 착용한 마스크를 잡아당기고, 오른손으로 E의 얼굴 부위를 2회 때리며, 오른발로 E의 왼쪽 허벅지 위쪽 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in regard to the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. An investigation report (Attachment to a CD and a screen by cutting down the CCTV images) - Application of the CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. It is not good that a crime is committed by assaulting a police official on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, the attitude of the defendant to recognize and reflect all crimes seems to be.

Intoxicated, it has been committing a crime by accident.

There is no previous offense exceeding a fine.

The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of such circumstances, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant.