A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 3, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

피고인은 2020. 7. 13. 00:51경 인천 서구 B에 있는 C 앞 도로에서 ‘주차된 차량을 충격 후 도주한다’는 112신고를 받고 출동한 인천서부경찰서 D지구대 소속 경위 E 등으로부터, 피고인에게서 술 냄새가 나고 얼굴에 홍조를 띠며 발음이 부정확한 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 약 21분에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주측정에 응할 것을 요구받았음에도 불구하고 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Investigation report (No. 4 No. 4 in the order of evidence);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, reply reports, and summary orders;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Addenda to the Road Traffic Act (Act No. 17371 of Jun. 9, 2020), Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44(2) of the former Road Traffic Act (wholly amended by Act No. 17371 of Jun. 9, 2020), the choice of imprisonment for a prison labor

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include: (a) the Defendant appears to recognize and reflect the instant crime at the latest; (b) the driving distance is relatively short; and (c) the Defendant’s age and working environment; (d) motive and means of motive for committing the instant crime; and (e) the circumstances after committing the instant crime, etc., no sentencing guidelines specified in the arguments and records are set.

(1) The punishment as ordered shall be determined in comprehensive consideration of each subparagraph.