Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for six months, respectively.

provided that this ruling has become final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was a person who operated the “G” corporation, an electrical construction company, from around 2005 to around 2012. From around 2005 to around 201, Defendant B operated the “I” as a person who sells electrical construction materials from around 2007 to H and 34 Dong 131 at the time of Si interest. From around 2008, the relationship between the said “G” purchased and used materials from the said “I” was friendly.

Defendant

A In the process of issuing a letter of guarantee from the Korea Credit Guarantee Fund, extending the loan system for corporate purchase fund, and lending by financial institutions, with intent to obtain money through a formal review by using a b2B website, such as not verifying whether it has been actually traded and the source of using the purchase fund, etc., which are dependent only on the tax invoices issued by subordinate companies, and the examination is proposed to obtain money, and Defendant B shall obtain cooperation to obtain B2B loan. It is only entered as a result of entering the B2B website after obtaining the approval procedure allowing B2B to enter the bank website, and then making a deposit of KRW 160 million into the I account, the transfer of KRW 140 million to the I account. The rest of the two million will be partially repaid to the existing goods payment obligation of “G” with respect to “I”, and Defendant B accepted this and the Defendants shall obtain money through a corporate loan.

1. Defendant A, around June 28, 201, connected to the above “G office” website (K) that is a loan program for corporate purchase through the Internet, entered the ID, password, and then purchased goods worth KRW 120,000,000 from “I” on six occasions in the aggregate from “G” to “I”, and then sent the information on the loan application to the victim IBK bank, and Defendant B on the same day.